Grozljiva novica

[SiR]

Bush Diagnosed With Attention-To-Deficit Disorder

WASHINGTON, DCPointing to massive war-time tax cuts, physicians from the Congressional Budget Office diagnosed President Bush with attention-to-deficit disorder Tuesday. "The president exhibits all the symptoms of ATDD: impulsiveness, restlessness, inability to focus on mounting U.S. debt likely to reach $400 billion by the year's end," Dr. Terrence Spellman said. "Failing to address his affliction could lead to serious long-term fiscal health problems for future generations of Americans." To treat the president's ATDD, Spellman prescribed Ritalin and an introductory course in high-school economics.

:P

[lojzi]

In kaj je tuklaj grozljivega ;) B) <_<

[kekec III]

Bush Diagnosed With Attention-To-Deficit Disorder

WASHINGTON, DCPointing to massive war-time tax cuts, physicians from the Congressional Budget Office diagnosed President Bush with attention-to-deficit disorder Tuesday. "The president exhibits all the symptoms of ATDD: impulsiveness, restlessness, inability to focus on mounting U.S. debt likely to reach $400 billion by the year's end," Dr. Terrence Spellman said. "Failing to address his affliction could lead to serious long-term fiscal health problems for future generations of Americans." To treat the president's ATDD, Spellman prescribed Ritalin and an introductory course in high-school economics.

:P

res grozno.... :ph34r:

[BaTeMaN]

Disorder je že prava beseda.

Bogi Buš... vsi ga zajebavajo...

[kekec III]

Disorder je že prava beseda.

Bogi Buš... vsi ga zajebavajo...

..rabi pa veliko časa,da to opazi... :blink:

[Pravokotar]

B)

[Ganges]

Tale Bush je pa res eno teslo.

Saj še govoriti ne zna!

joj joj joj

[Dave]

Bush Diagnosed With Attention-To-Deficit Disorder

Ah, ko bi bilo vsaj kaj na tem...

[Nata]

Ah, ko bi bilo vsaj kaj na tem...

:blink:

Dave you said it!

:rolleyes:

mogoče pa Bušek rabi sam mal tablet Dabistal pa eno fancy Domino

:ph34r: :P :D B) :lol: :ph34r:

[Brrrm]

Ne razumem, zakaj imate toliko težav s predsednikom države, katere državljani niste, pa še dokaj daleč stran stoji?

Ali res tako pomembno in usodno vpliva na tokove vaših življenj?

:unsure:

[Pravokotar]

Ne razumem, zakaj imate toliko težav s predsednikom države, katere državljani niste, pa še dokaj daleč stran stoji?

Ali res tako pomembno in usodno vpliva na tokove vaših življenj?

:unsure:

Kje pa! :D

Je pa izborna kost za obiranje.

Takle trotl, ob katerem celo mi precej brihtni izpademo... ;) :D

[Brrrm]

Aha, torej nekakšen pospeševalnik pameti tale Mr. Grm :lol: :lol: :lol:

[BaTeMaN]

Ne razumem, zakaj imate toliko težav s predsednikom države, katere državljani niste, pa še dokaj daleč stran stoji?

Ali res tako pomembno in usodno vpliva na tokove vaših življenj?

:unsure:

Na res dolgo in široko.... ZATO ! :)

> > Q. Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

> >

> > A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction.

> >

> > Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of

> > mass

> > destruction.

> >

> > A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.

> >

> > Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?

> >

> > A: Yep. Invasions always work better than

> > inspections.

> >

> > Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find

> > any

> > weapons of mass

> > destruction, did we?

> >

> > A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden.

> > Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right

> > before the 2004 election.

> >

> > Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass

> > destruction?

> >

> > A: To use them in a war, silly.

> >

> > Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that

> > they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they

> > use

> > any of those weapons when we went to war with them?

> >

> > A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know

> > they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the

> > thousands rather than defend themselves.

> >

> > Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to

> > die if they had all those big weapons with which

> > they could have fought back?

> >

> > A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to

> > make

> > sense.

> >

> > Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they

> > had

> > any of those weapons our government said they did.

> >

> > A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not

> > they had those weapons. We had another good reason

> > to

> > invade them anyway.

> >

> > Q: And what was that?

> >

> > A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass

> > destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator,

> > which is another good reason to invade another

> > country.

> >

> > Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it

> > OK

> > to invade his

> > country?

> >

> > A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

> >

> > Q: Kind of like what they do in China?

> >

> > A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good

> > economic competitor, where millions of people work

> > for

> > slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations

> > richer.

> >

> > Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for

> > American corporate

> > gain, it's a good country, even if that country

> > tortures people?

> >

> > A: Right.

> >

> > Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?

> >

> > A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing

> > the

> > government. People who criticized the government in

> > Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.

> >

> > Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?

> >

> > A: I told you, China is different.

> >

> > Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?

> >

> > A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath

> > party, while China is Communist.

> >

> > Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?

> >

> > A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

> >

> > Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?

> >

> > A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the

> > government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.

> >

> > Q: Like in Iraq?

> >

> > A: Exactly.

> >

> > Q: And like in China, too?

> >

> > A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor.

> > Cuba, on the other hand, is not.

> >

> > Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?

> >

> > A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our

> > government passed some laws that made it illegal for

> > Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba

> > until

> > they stopped being Communists and started being

> > capitalists like us.

> >

> > Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade

> > with Cuba, and started doing business with them,

> > wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?

> >

> > A: Don't be a smart-ass.

> >

> > Q: I didn't think I was being one.

> >

> > A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of

> > religion in Cuba.

> >

> > Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?

> >

> > A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China.

> > Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a

> > military coup, so he's not really a legitimate

> > leader

> > anyway.

> >

> > Q: What's a military coup?

> >

> > A: That's when a military general takes over the

> > government of a country by force, instead of holding

> > free elections like we do in the United States.

> >

> > Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a

> > military coup?

> >

> > A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he

> > did, but Pakistan is our friend.

> >

> > Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is

> > illegitimate?

> >

> > A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

> >

> > Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes

> > to

> > power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate

> > government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?

> >

> > A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our

> > friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.

> >

> > Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?

> >

> > A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

> >

> > Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?

> >

> > A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men - fifteen

> > of

> > them Saudi Arabians - hijacked four airplanes and

> > flew

> > three of them into buildings in New York and

> > Washington, killing 3,000 innocent people.

> >

> > Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?

> >

> > A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained,

> > under

> > the oppressive rule of the Taliban.

> >

> > Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who

> > chopped off people's heads and hands?

> >

> > A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did

> > they chop off people's heads and hands, but they

> > oppressed women, too.

> >

> > Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban

> > 43

> > million dollars back in May of 2001?

> >

> > A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did

> > such a good job

> > fighting drugs.

> >

> > Q: Fighting drugs?

> >

> > A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping

> > people from growing opium poppies.

> >

> > Q: How did they do such a good job?

> >

> > A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium

> > poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and

> > heads

> > cut off.

> >

> > Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and

> > hands for growing

> > flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's

> > heads and hands off for other reasons?

> >

> > A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic

> > fundamentalists cut off people's hands for growing

> > flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's

> > hands

> > for stealing bread.

> >

> > Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads

> > in

> > Saudi Arabia?

> >

> > A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a

> > tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and

> > forced

> > them to wear burqas whenever they were in public,

> > with

> > death by stoning as the penalty for women who did

> > not

> > comply.

> >

> > Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public,

> > too?

> >

> > A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic

> > body covering.

> >

> > Q: What's the difference?

> >

> > A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi

> > women is a modest yet fashionable garment that

> > covers

> > all of a woman's body except for her eyes and

> > fingers.

> > The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of

> > patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's

> > body except for her eyes and fingers.

> >

> > Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different

> > name.

> >

> > A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi

> > Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.

> >

> > Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on

> > September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.

> >

> > A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

> >

> > Q: Who trained them?

> >

> > A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

> >

> > Q: Was he from Afghanistan?

> >

> > A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was

> > a

> > bad man, a very bad man.

> >

> > Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.

> >

> > A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel

> > the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the

> > 1980s.

> >

> > Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist

> > Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?

> >

> > A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke

> > up in 1990 or

> > thereabouts, and now they have elections and

> > capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.

> >

> > Q: So the Soviets - I mean, the Russians - are now

> > our

> > friends?

> >

> > A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends

> > for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but

> > then they decided not to support our invasion of

> > Iraq,

> > so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the

> > French

> > and the Germans because they didn't help us invade

> > Iraq either.

> >

> > Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?

> >

> > A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had

> > to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom

> > Fries and Freedom Toast.

> >

> > Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another

> > country

> > doesn't do what we want them to do?

> >

> > A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies,

> > we

> > invade.

> >

> > Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the

> > 1980s?

> >

> > A: Well, yeah. For a while.

> >

> > Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?

> >

> > A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against

> > Iran,

> > which made him our friend, temporarily.

> >

> > Q: Why did that make him our friend?

> >

> > A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.

> >

> > Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?

> >

> > A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at

> > the

> > time, we looked the other way, to show him we were

> > his

> > friend.

> >

> > Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies

> > automatically becomes our friend?

> >

> > A: Most of the time, yes.

> >

> > Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends

> > is

> > automatically an enemy?

> >

> > A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American

> > corporations can profit by selling weapons to both

> > sides at the same time, all the better.

> >

> > Q: Why?

> >

> > A: Because war is good for the economy, which means

> > war is good for

> > America. Also, since God is on America's side,

> > anyone

> > who opposes war is a godless unAmerican Communist.

> > Do

> > you understand now why we attacked Iraq?

> >

> > Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted

> > us

> > to, right?

> >

> > A: Yes.

> >

> > Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?

> >

> > A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W.

> > Bush and tells him what to do.

> >

> > Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we

> > attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in

> > his head?

> >

> > A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works.

> > Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and

> > go

> > to sleep. Good night.

> >

> > Q: Good night, Daddy.

[klimbra]

B)

Definitivno najboljša antibush propaganda!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pozivam "vrle slovenke",da na enak način JAVNO protestirajo proti bush-u.......in to nestrinjanje javno pokažejo......naprimer ob Sredah,po 19,00,na 3M.

Obljubljamo hudo podporo!!!!!!! :P

[Pravokotar]